CNET Reports a new senate bill that would grant the President of the United State power to control and disconnect private computers in a time of an emergency. This has set alarm bells to go off by internet and civil liberties groups.
There is also a revised version of the bill S.773 by Senator Jay Rockerfeller(D-West Virginia) which allow the white house to seize control over private sector computer networks during a cybersecurity emergency.
Senate bill 773 would allow the president to “declare a cybersecurity emergency” relating to “non-governmental” computer networks and to what ever it take to protect the nation. The bill has provision to create a federal certification in Cybersecurity professionals.
First Amendment advocates were alarmed of the provisions think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness,” said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance, their members includes Verisign, Verizon, Nortel and Carnegie-Mellon University.
“It is unclear what authority Sen. Rockefeller thinks is necessary over the private sector. Unless this is clarified, we cannot properly analyze, let alone support the bill.”
A spokesperson for Senator Rockerfeller declined to comment. A source that is aware of the bill compare what President Bush did immediately after 9/11 terrorist attacks by stopping air traffic. The senate source says the government is concerned about an attack to the electrical grid via a broadband connection.
This comes on a the heels of a statement by President Obama in May where he announces that the government in not prepared to handle these attacks. The White House still has not hire a cybersecurity officer and a cyber security aid stepped down in less than three month on the post.
Meanwhile The Free speech advocacy group Electronic Frontier Foundation says the project has raised eyebrows in the legislation. Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the in San Francisco. “As soon as you’re saying that the federal government is going to be exercising this kind of power over private networks, it’s going to be a really big issue,” he says.
The most controverisal part of proposition is section 201 which permits the president to “direct the national response to the cyber threat” if necessary for “the national defense and security.” Also the administration to map out private network to be critical country and the these entities “shall share” with the federal government.
The language has changed but it doesn’t contain any real additional limits,” EFF’s Tien says. “It simply switches the more direct and obvious language they had originally to the more ambiguous (version)…The designation of what is a critical infrastructure system or network as far as I can tell has no specific process. There’s no provision for any administrative process or review. That’s where the problems seem to start. And then you have the amorphous powers that go along with it.”
More on CNET News